Covers conformance fixtures, adversarial cases, quality metrics, budgets, monitoring, fallback, and incident review for conversational analytics, so adopters can turn a business question into a bounded analytics dialogue and a structured dashboard without e...
Package status: reference context ready for human review. The contract and test scenarios are complete, but no claim is made that an adopting implementation has passed them.
Decision
For Conversational analytics, verify the contract under success, denial, failure, recovery, load, and drift so adopters can turn a business question into a bounded analytics dialogue and a structured dashboard without exposing raw data-access primitives to the model. The assistant may discover, describe, query, compare, and present approved metrics; it cannot execute SQL, change data, or invent metric semantics. This is a reference contract: database products, numeric budgets, jurisdictions, retention, organizational defaults, and accountable owners remain explicit adoption choices.
Scope
- The Conversational analytics actors, inputs, outputs, states, versions, and externally visible outcomes needed to turn a business question into a bounded analytics dialogue and a structured dashboard without exposing raw data-access primitives to the model.
- The role-specific focus of this block: verify the contract under success, denial, failure, recovery, load, and drift, including primary, cached, asynchronous, export, support, and recovery paths where applicable.
- Adoption-specific configuration, ownership, rollout, evidence retention, and review responsibilities needed to use the contract safely.
Outside this block
- The assistant may discover, describe, query, compare, and present approved metrics; it cannot execute SQL, change data, or invent metric semantics.
- Choosing a universal database, model, renderer, vendor, numeric threshold, retention period, timezone, jurisdiction, or service-level objective.
- Claiming that packaged scenarios ran against a downstream implementation or that this reference grants security, privacy, accessibility, analytical, or legal approval.
Contract
- Verification evidence for Conversational analytics must demonstrate this rule: The assistant resolves metric, subject, interval, comparison, grain, dimensions, and decision goal before requesting analytical values.
- Verification evidence for Conversational analytics must demonstrate this rule: It uses catalog discovery and typed analytical tools only; no prompt, memory item, retrieved text, or user request can enable an unrestricted SQL tool.
- Verification evidence for Conversational analytics must demonstrate this rule: Caller identity and authorization scope come from the trusted host context and are rechecked by every tool rather than supplied as authoritative model arguments.
- Verification evidence for Conversational analytics must demonstrate this rule: Material ambiguity produces one focused clarification with visible assumptions; low-impact display choices may use documented organizational defaults.
- Verification evidence for Conversational analytics must demonstrate this rule: The answer includes plain metric descriptions, exact periods, values, deltas, charts or tables, freshness, caveats, and an evidence-backed summary.
- Verification evidence for Conversational analytics must demonstrate this rule: Observed change, arithmetic contribution, association, experiment result, forecast, and causal conclusion are distinct claim classes with different evidence gates.
- Verification evidence for Conversational analytics must demonstrate this rule: The conversation stores normalized analytical handles and result IDs, not raw restricted rows or credentials, and revalidates scope when a handle is reused.
- Verification evidence for Conversational analytics must demonstrate this rule: When tools fail or evidence is insufficient, the assistant returns a bounded partial answer or abstention and suggests a safe next analytical action.
Implementation guidance
- Create paired positive and negative fixtures for each public operation, semantic rule, authorization boundary, and terminal state.
- Measure correctness, unsupported output, denial consistency, latency, resource use, and recovery by contract and implementation version.
- Inject dependency, policy, schema, freshness, cancellation, and audit failures before promoting the implementation beyond review.
- Keep human domain review for consequential interpretations and feed disagreements into versioned fixtures and rules.
Failure handling and safeguards
- For Conversational analytics, Prompt injection requesting SQL, broader tenants, hidden dimensions, credentials, or write operations is denied and recorded without revealing protected metadata.
- For Conversational analytics, An ambiguous organization name or metric alias remains unresolved until the tool returns one authorized match or the user selects among safe candidates.
- For Conversational analytics, If chart generation fails, the assistant preserves the validated result as text and a data table instead of fabricating a visual conclusion.
Verification and operations
- For the testing evidence of Conversational analytics, evaluate representative executive, internal, customer, and account-manager questions against expected metric, scope, period, and output plans.
- For the testing evidence of Conversational analytics, run injection, cross-tenant, stale-handle, unsupported-metric, zero-baseline, partial-data, and tool-timeout adversarial cases.
- For the testing evidence of Conversational analytics, score factual consistency by recalculating every statement and plotted value from structured tool results rather than comparing prose alone.
Adoption assumptions
- The adopting product has authenticated identity, a versioned authorization policy, owned metric definitions, bounded telemetry, and a controlled path for change.
- Names and values in the example are fictional adoption fixtures, not universal defaults, production credentials, performance promises, or business targets.
- Referenced specifications constrain protocol, security, accessibility, or vendor behavior; the adopting team must confirm current applicability before promotion.
The executable-looking examples in this package are fixtures and acceptance contracts. Run the collection validator to check structure and metadata, then translate and execute the scenarios in the target repository before recording implementation evidence.
References
- NIST AI 600-1, Generative AI Profile (applies as of 2026-09-12)
- Model Context Protocol 2026-07-28, Tools (applies as of 2026-09-12)